<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Load Balancing Mongrel with Pen on Windows 2003 server x64 64bit 64 bit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/</link>
	<description>taming the animal...and linux too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TylerMontgomery</title>
		<link>http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>TylerMontgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>@kevin
The company I was working for was extremely stodgy when it came to buying anything hardware or software related.  It was like pulling teeth to get them to buy $300 computers for the business people to use (even though the owner drives a $350,000 Ferrari when the weather&#039;s nice oh and his daily driver is a $100,000 Benz).  Terrible company. 

Anyway, I&#039;m now using haproxy to load balance between clusters of mongrels and stunnel in front for ssl and nginx for redirecting port 80 to 443 and to serve images.  But now i have the pleasure of not dealing with Windows boxes (CentOS now).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kevin<br />
The company I was working for was extremely stodgy when it came to buying anything hardware or software related.  It was like pulling teeth to get them to buy $300 computers for the business people to use (even though the owner drives a $350,000 Ferrari when the weather&#8217;s nice oh and his daily driver is a $100,000 Benz).  Terrible company. </p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m now using haproxy to load balance between clusters of mongrels and stunnel in front for ssl and nginx for redirecting port 80 to 443 and to serve images.  But now i have the pleasure of not dealing with Windows boxes (CentOS now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Mahon</title>
		<link>http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Mahon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>What are your reasons for choosing apache instead of a  &quot;hardware&quot; load balancers even when the HLBs have come down to prices around 2500 with full functionality and support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your reasons for choosing apache instead of a  &#8220;hardware&#8221; load balancers even when the HLBs have come down to prices around 2500 with full functionality and support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TylerMontgomery</title>
		<link>http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>TylerMontgomery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>@Danny
Danny, the &quot;other software company&quot; I mention at the beginning of the post sort of forced the company I contract for to purchase a x64 Windows 2003 server.  So its here in the office and it&#039;d be a waste (maybe not) to not use a Xeon chip with 8gb of RAM for my own disposal - the thing is lightning fast but getting a Rails config working on it was a nightmare until mongrel got updated and I got apache setup (see my post about &lt;a href=&quot;http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/apache-on-windows-x64-as-load-balancer-for-mongrel/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;apache on windows 2003&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Danny<br />
Danny, the &#8220;other software company&#8221; I mention at the beginning of the post sort of forced the company I contract for to purchase a x64 Windows 2003 server.  So its here in the office and it&#8217;d be a waste (maybe not) to not use a Xeon chip with 8gb of RAM for my own disposal &#8211; the thing is lightning fast but getting a Rails config working on it was a nightmare until mongrel got updated and I got apache setup (see my post about <a href="http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/apache-on-windows-x64-as-load-balancer-for-mongrel/" rel="nofollow">apache on windows 2003</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awesomerails.wordpress.com/2007/08/30/load-balancing-mongrel-with-pen-on-windows-2003-server-x64-64bit-64-bit/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Very interesting!  We signed up with Server Intellect because they have their own independently licensed copy of Windows Server 2003, and it can be rebooted independently.  It&#039;s managed with the Terminal Services/Remote Desktop, has its own System Registry, Applications and System Files.  It&#039;s a great value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting!  We signed up with Server Intellect because they have their own independently licensed copy of Windows Server 2003, and it can be rebooted independently.  It&#8217;s managed with the Terminal Services/Remote Desktop, has its own System Registry, Applications and System Files.  It&#8217;s a great value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
